The big health care legislation passed the other day, and it won’t affect anybody for another few years. So why am I posting about it?
Because it raises a huge question: is health care a human right?
There are two types of rights generally considered in sociology/philosphy: there are positive rights and there are negative rights. Positive rights are those which you are given by an authority; material gifts guaranteed to you just for being human. Healthcare would fall under this category, as would the right to education, etc.
Negative rights are those which you already have and are guaranteed NOT to have taken away. Free speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion and reproductive rights would fall under this category. Guns go either way; in the context of the second amendment, the right to bear arms is a negative right, since the government isn’t handing anyone weapons. The amendment simply states that they cannot be seized.
This country, originally, was founded on the basis of promoting negative rights only. It was only later that politicians began enforcing more and more positive rights, for better or for worse. So healthcare, whether you support it or not, is not the same kind of right as those upon which the United States was founded. It’s just different. It’s a positive right.
At Towson University, once we enter into the school’s pact by paying tuition, we are essentially guaranteed basic healthcare at Dowell Health Center.
But how many good stories have you heard from there? Sometimes it’s a mess. More often than not, in the experiences of people I know, it makes patients worse.
Not to vilify Dowell; it’s also somewhat of a learning institution, but it doesn’t make me feel like I’m going to get healthy, even though, it’s “guaranteed.” Let’s be careful about the rhetoric we throw around in the healthcare debate.